|
|
This last scenario, the ability of the State to convert its population into highly qualified workers who will not be easily replaceable by automatic processes or robots has enormous weight. Log in to respond María Mercedes García Díaz Hello Miguel Angel, thank you for your excellent analysis. It is a great contradiction, we are facing very individualistic societies, but at the same time with social conscience. I think that individualism favors a type of consumption based on the enjoyment of the experience beyond the product, but at the same time, generation Z should continue with a model of greater responsibility and awareness in consumption.
Víctor Pol The article is very interesting. Personally, I believe that Denmark WhatsApp Number Data we are on the verge of a new business paradigm. When it comes to global changes we tend to appeal to the immutability of things (at least in the short term), but the fact is that the world is constantly changing and the progression of said change is increasing. The global crisis became evident the obsolescence of traditional capitalism. I think that the impact that the crisis has had on society has made it clear that the benefit cannot be counted only at a monetary level and that not everything is worth everything to achieve it.
The acceleration of change has caused that when neither business ethics nor a sustainable business model is taken into account, the consequences are no longer suffered by "other" generations, but are just around the corner and can bring down a business from the top in a short time. I think this is leading to changing the focus of traditional companies and being present from the beginning in the majority of startups. The uncertainty of the future is increasing and to develop viable long-term business plans, the social and environmental impacts of said business activity must be taken into account.
|
|
發表於 15:05:24