It is not possible to demand compliance with an invalid contract,
The result of a scam orchestrated by a third party via the Judiciary. Likewise, it is also unfeasible to recognize subjective civil liability for possible reciprocal fault without formulating a claim for compensation. Disclosure Judge denied request for fulfillment of sales contract signed with scammer Disclosure This was the basis adopted by judge Renata Bolzan Jauris, of the 2nd Civil Court of Apucarana (PR), to dismiss the request for an obligation to do so against the owners of a pickup truck as unfounded. In this case, the author of the action was approached by a swindler with an offer to sell a pickup truck below market value, for R$60,000. The scammer, in turn, presented the vehicle owners with an offer worth R$85,000. The vehicle owners accepted the agreed price and took the car for inspection at a dealership. The review was carried out and the procedures for transferring ownership of the car began. The scammer then agreed to pay R$60,000 with the plaintiff and asked for the transfer to be made in his name, as the car had been given to him as payment for part of a debt.Upon realizing that the value of the car had not been transferred, the owners of the truck refused to sign the transfer documentation. The buyer then sued the Judiciary requesting urgent relief to seize the property and block the owners' accounts up to the value of R$60,000. The truck owners appealed the decision and proved that th Special Phone Number Data ey had not received the amounts deposited in the scammer's name. When analyzing the case, the judge understood that the request for obligation to do so was unfounded. “It is interesting to note that the author's representative recognizes that there was a 'false sale' and filed a lawsuit aiming to make it happen (false sale), which is incongruous from a legal point of view, especially fraud can never be confused with a legal transaction valid”, he registered.
http://zh-cn.sgphonelist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/image36.png
Therefore, she denied the request and ordered the plaintiff to pay the court costs and 10% of the value of the case in succumbing fees. The vehicle owners were represented by lawyer Alison Gonçalves da Silva.In a business company, the person who manages the business through a public power of attorney receives secondary delegation in the strict sense to carry out certain administrative and business acts, being prohibited from replacing the managing partner defined in the articles of incorporation. Reproduction / Instagram Judge decided to remove two managers from the administration of the nightclub Futuro Club Reproduction / Instagram This was the basis adopted by judge Cristian Battaglia de Medeiros, from the 23rd Civil Court of Goiânia, to grant an injunction to remove from the management of the nightclub Futuro Club, based in Goiânia, two people who acted through power of attorney. In the action, the author narrates that his partner's two brothers acted recklessly in the management of the enterprise, compromising society and generating civil, regulatory, criminal and corporate risks. He also pointed out the creation of bank accounts without his knowledge and diversion of resources from the Futuro Club venture to other businesses.
頁:
[1]